1997 Chevrolet Corvette Walkaround Review at Automotive.com
»Locate a Dealer»Find a Used Car»Get Financing

1997 Chevrolet Corvette Review: Exterior

Find a Car
 

1997 Chevrolet Corvette Review

A World-Class All-American.
Walkaround
Unlike previous Corvette redesigns, the styling of the fifth generation

represents an evolutionary change rather than a distinct visual break from

the previous model. It's not easy to see the changes at a glance, particularly

if you're looking at the car from the front. The new hood has a slightly

more contemporary shape, reminiscent of the Mazda RX-7, but the pop-up

headlights lend a familiar look, as do the overall proportions, which are

classic sports car--long hood, short rear deck, and a wide, action-ready

stance.

Distinctions at the rear are more apparent. The rear fascia has been

squared off, and the glass of the rear hatch is fully framed, making it

much easier to close and much less prone to breakage. The going-away view

is much more aggressive, giving the new Vette the look of a Le Mans racer.

Overall, this is a shape that evolved in the wind tunnel, a development

program that included the underside of the car as well as the surface.

The payoff is outstanding aerodynamic efficiency. The new Corvette rolls

into showrooms with a coefficient of drag rating of 0.29, better than any

other General Motors offering save for the ultra-slippery EV-1 electric.

Aerodynamic efficiency pays dividends in high-speed stability, fuel economy

and reduced wind noise, just one example of the painstaking attention to

detail that went into this all-new car.

All-new is always a relative term in the car biz, of course, but it's

truly appropros here. Beneath its plastic body panels, the Corvette has

a new chassis with rigidity numbers that make its competent predecessor

seem like a piece of spaghetti. Chassis rigidity is the starting point

for good handling, ride quality and noise isolation, and the new Corvette

is vastly improved on all three counts.

As before, the strength of the chassis lies in two massive siderails.

However, thanks to a new production technique the rails are one-piece units,

rather than a multi-piece fabrication, and are far stronger as a result.

The front suspension is anchored to sturdy sub-framing, and the rear suspension

has been redesigned so that the halfshafts, which transfer power from the

differential to the rear wheels, no longer have to double as suspension

components. All of this conspires to keep all four tires solidly in contact

with mother earth, regardless of the road surface.

Wheelbase is another key ingredient in ride quality, and the new Corvette

has more of it--8.3 inches more, to be precise. That's a big stretch, and

the car's track has been widened proportionately. The body is also substantially

wider--almost three inches--but overall length has stretched by just over

an inch, which means there's less car extending beyond the axles, fore

and aft, a plus in the weight distribution scheme.

A bigger plus in this regard is the transmission location, which has

been moved to the rear of the car. It all adds up to a 51/49 front/rear

weight split, a key factor in the new car's outstanding handling balance.

And speaking of weight, the basic Corvette scales in 69 pounds lighter

than its predecessor, a noteworthy achievement considering the increases

in structural rigidity and overall dimension.

You expect power in a Corvette, and the new Vette's 5.7-liter V8 has

plenty--345 horsepower, enough to produce consistent 0-to-60 mph dashes

in less than five seconds with the standard six-speed manual transmission

(an electronically-controlled four-speed continues to be the automatic

option).

The intriguing element here is the engine's design, which preserves

Chevy's classic small-block overhead-valve concept, dating to 1955, even

though virtually all its components are new and it's all aluminum. Why

didn't Chevy go with a contemporary overhead cam, multi-valve design? Chevrolet

cites tradition, but the key elements were probably the relatively low

cost of production (fewer moving parts) and packagability (tidier dimensions

overall).

In any case, there's plenty of thrust and fuel economy is surprisingly

good for a car in this performance class. Next Page



1997 Chevrolet Corvette
  
Similarly Priced