If what you want is to outbrake a BMW M5, don't count on it. The BMW has bigger brakes (Tale of the tape: BMW: front 13.6 in, rear, 12.9. Benz: 13.2 front, 11.8 rear). And while the BMW weighs more (Tale of the scale: BMW, 4024 lbs; Benz, 3444), the CLK55 AMG just couldn't stop like the M5 when braking hard from 90 mph to 30 mph to set up for a corner. Compared with the M5, the brakes on the AMG Mercedes seem soft. Generally, the brakes on the CLK55 AMG could be firmer and still be civilized.
Ride quality is smooth and comfortable at all times; did you expect less from a Mercedes?
A BMW M5 should be able to take corners more quickly than a CLK55 AMG. But this isn't a race, it's about driving. The suspension compromises made by the CLK are gentlemanly, and in keeping with its drop-dead gorgeous looks. It likes to be flicked into a turn, meaning it's fun to flick it, but a hard flick doesn't always end exactly at the end of the flick. On an uneven surface in a sweeping corner, the CLK may twitch just enough to keep you honest and under control and out of jail. It never suggests that it might like to take control from you, it teases and excites you. The twitch that comes under real hard braking on uneven surfaces is less secure. But we're talking real hard braking.
At the other extreme of the springs, the CLK can be so light on its feet that they feel like they leave the ground. We thought "Wheee!" when we saw the traction control light flutter as we crested a hump on a two-lane at high speed, especially when we knew the touchdown would be secure.
And then we came upon the patches of ice in the road. We had been looking for them, in order to test ESP, the electronic stability program that corrects a slide by individually braking the wheels. It works. Sudden icy spots can be handled by ESP. Just don't turn the ASR traction control off, because the ESP goes with it.
(For more detailed driving impressions of the CLK320 and CLK430 models, check out newcartestdrive.com reviews from 2000 and 1998.) Next Page