|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Above Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

2000 | Volkswagen Beetle GLS Ethel, Washington | Hatchbacks | $8,995 | White | 70,994 |  | 101.7 mi |

2001 | Volkswagen Beetle GL Salem, Oregon | Hatchbacks | $9,988 | Silver Metallic | 51,293 |  | 4.2 mi |

2000 | Volkswagen Beetle GLS Olympia, Washington | Hatchbacks | $6,990 | Silver Metallic | 120,972 |  | 134.0 mi |

2007 | Volkswagen Beetle 2.5 Olympia, Washington | Hatchbacks | $14,990 | | 18,565 |  | 134.0 mi |

2004 | Volkswagen Beetle GLS Gresham, Oregon | Convertibles | $16,990 | Cream | 42,519 |  | 49.1 mi |
|
PROFESSIONAL REVIEW
Volkswagen has kicked its retro-fad car into high gear with the introduction of a New Beetle Turbo S. Flying off the line from 0 to 60 miles per hour in a mere 7.4 seconds, the new Turbo S promises to appeal to a wider audience: guys, in other words. A true lightning bug, the Turbo S has been clocked at 130 mph and features a speed-activated rear spoiler. That sounds like more than a mere nostalgia car. Technically, competitors will include its cousin, the Audi TT, its stablemates, the GolfGTI, and, in some circles, other retro-mobiles like the PT Cruiser, the Thunderbird and the Mini. But the newest Beetle's unique looks and stand-out performance make it a species apart. The rest of the Beetle line continues to turn heads, however, and 2002 brings special color editions in Riviera Blue and Pastel Green; Snap Orange, Double Yellow, and Cyber Green come with special seats, trim, and wheel inserts. Very cool.
|
|
For those who used to watch the transformers cartoon
So I was cruising the internet and found some stuff on the upcoming Transfomers movie, and according to the source...
08/22/2006 | 15:08 PM
|
|
|
beetle gas milage?
ok i just bought a 2004 volkswagen beetle convertable and on my 1st tank of gas i only got about 16 miles to the...
01/08/2007 | 04:01 AM
|
|
|
Car news on Automotive.com blog
Here's some of the news this week:...
11/17/2006 | 09:11 AM
|
|
|
Best and Worse movie cars
From Cars.com. Did they miss anything? I'm wondering what happened to KITT and the General Lee....
06/09/2006 | 13:06 PM
|
|
|
Lemon Volkswagen 2004
I have owned 2 VW a 2000 New Beetle and had it for 8 years. Never a problem with it. I just bought a Brand New 2007 New...
09/28/2007 | 14:09 PM
|
|
|
|
| |