|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

2005 | BMW X3 3.0i Vancouver, Washington | SUVs | $23,988 | Highland Green Metallic | 26,763 |  | 123.4 mi |

2004 | BMW X3 2.5i Seattle, Washington | SUVs | $19,800 | Jet Black | 42,952 | 866-645-2295 | 8.3 mi |

2004 | BMW X3 2.5i Seattle, Washington | SUVs | $19,800 | Black | 45,171 | 866-645-2295 | 8.3 mi |

2005 | BMW X3 3.0i Seattle, Washington | SUVs | $22,600 | Blue | 38,608 | 866-645-2295 | 8.3 mi |

2005 | BMW X3 3.0i Seattle, Washington | SUVs | $22,800 | Jet Black | 38,558 | 866-645-2295 | 8.3 mi |
|
PROFESSIONAL REVIEW
The 2004 BMW X3 is an all-new, mid-level, near-luxury sport-utility powered by the company's proven six-cylinder engines. The X3 is equipped with BMW's xDrive all-wheel-drive system, Dynamic Stability Control and Hill Descent Control, all designed to give it tenacious grip and secure control in less than favorable conditions. BMW may build the ultimate driving machine, but the X3 shouldn't be considered a contender for the title of ultimate off-road vehicle. This isn't BMW's intent. But the X3 should do what a BMW owner feeling the need for something akin to an SUV wants as well as or better than any other in its class does. And this it does. The X3 is quick and fast, considering its heft. The xDrive puts it at the head of the class when weather or road goes north. It's roomy, both for passengers and cargo. And just as important, it's replete with safety features, both active and passive.
|
|
X3 & X5: Did BMW sell out?
I don't think it will diminish their reputation but it saddens me to see automakers like BMW, Porsche and even Benz...
11/01/2006 | 11:11 AM
|
|
|
When a HUMMER H3 is not a HUMMER
The Hummer H3 is like a BMW X3, both aim for people who can not afford (or too scared to drive) the Hummer H2 and the...
07/20/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
|
07 Trailblazer or Envoy vs. 05 Chrysler Pacifica
Thanks for the updated list of requirements. You've certainly included ALOT of them, which is good, but it also means...
07/18/2007 | 08:07 AM
|
|
|
Escalade , Tahoe or Expedition??
Would you believe it? The Range Rover shares many major chassis bones and the V8 engine with the BMW X5. Rover was...
09/08/2007 | 05:09 AM
|
|
|
Spy on the 2007 X3
Yup I agree. X3's design(looks) and quality make the car a shame to the BMWs....
06/27/2006 | 10:06 AM
|
|
Long-Term Update: 2005 BMW X3 2.5i
With the continuing popularity of SUVs--even with current fuel prices--it's surprising that BMW has managed for so long with the X5 as its sole representative in this lucrative and profitable segment.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 SUV of the Year Testing
Nothing is evolving faster than the sport/utility vehicle segment. Defining "sport/utility" is like trying to hit several fast-moving targets. Just try comparing them all
more
|
|
|
|
|
|