|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Above Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 BMW X3 Review
Refined interior materials and more features.
2005 X3 Review Summary & Specifications
|
The BMW X3 is hard to beat for people who want BMW's heritage look, powertrain and packaging, but desire the flexibility a sport-utility vehicle offers, or vice versa. The xDrive, Dynamic Stability Control and Hill Descent Control combine to offer excellent handling, grip, traction, stability in adverse conditions: on gravel roads, muddy two-tracks and snow-covered backroads. Overall fit is to the marque's standards, but the interior finish is disappointing. Leaving the options boxes unchecked yields an affordable and capable SUV that requires no apology, and judicious checking lets even a cost-conscious shopper have the desired luxuries. New Car Test Drive correspondent Tom Lankard is based in Northern California.
|
|
| Vehicle Category | Sport Utility Vehicles |
| Editor | Tom Lankard |
| Model Lineup | BMW X3 2.5i ($30,300); X3 3.0i ($36,300) |
| Engines (standard) | 3.0-liter dohc 24-valve inline-6 |
| Engines (optional) | 184-hp 2.5-liter inline-6; 225-hp 3.0-liter inline-6 |
| Transmissions (standard) | 5-speed Steptronic automatic |
| Transmissions (optional) | 6-speed manual; 5-speed Steptronic automatic |
| Safety Equipment (standard) | dual front airbags with dual-threshold, two-stage deployment; front seat side-impact airbags; height-adjustable front safety belts with automatic pre-tensioners and force limiters; three child-seat tether anchors in rear seat area; automatic locking retractors on all safety belts; head protection curtain for front and rear seat occupants; dynamic stability control system, including ABS, EBD, Brake Assist |
| Safety Equipment (optional) | rear door-mounted side-impact airbags; BMW Assist, including automatic collision notification and SOS call function |
| Basic Warranty | 4 years/50,000 miles |
| Assembled In | Graz, Austria |
| Manufacturer Phone | 1-800-334-4BMW |
| Manufacturer URL | www.bmwusa.com |
| Base Price MSRP | 30300 |
| Model Tested MSRP | BMW X3 3.0i ($36,300) |
| Standard Equipment | cruise control; automatic, micro-filter climate control; remote locking with key memory; 6-way power front seats with settings and outside mirror memory; power windows (front: up and down), outside mirrors and central locking; 3-stage heated front seats; 4-function onboard computer; vinyl upholstery; leather-wrapped, tilt-and-telescope steering wheel with redundant cruise and audio controls; wood trim; AM/FM/CD audio system with RDS, 8 speakers and 2 subwoofers; rear seat and cargo area accessory power outlets; front and rear reading lights; glove box-stored, rechargeable flashlight; rain-sensing windshield wipers; automatic headlight control; Halogen headlights; front foglights; rear air diffuser |
| Destination Charge | 695 |
| Options as Tested (MSRP) | Premium Package ($1,800) includes leather upholstery, auto-dimming rearview mirror, 4-way power lumbar, and BMW Assist; 5-speed Steptronic automatic transmission ($1,275); Servotronic steering ($250); Xenon headlights with auto-leveling ($800); rear door-mounted, side-impact airbags ($385); power folding outside mirrors ($250); on-board navigation system ($1,800); Park Distance Control, front and rear ($700) |
| Gas Guzzler Tax | |
| Price as Tested | 42980 |
| Layout | all-wheel drive |
| Horse Power | 225 @ 5900 |
| Torque | 214 @ 3500 |
| Fuel Economy | 16/23 |
| Wheelbase | 110.1 |
| Length/Width/Height | 179.7/73.0/66.0 |
| Track Front/Rear | |
| Turning Radius | 38.4 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 |
| Front Head/Hip/Leg room | 39.3/N/A/40.2 |
| Middle Head/Hip/Leg room | |
| Rear Head/Hip/Leg room | 39.4/N/A/35.8 |
| Trunk Volume | 71 |
| Payload | |
| Towing Capacity | 3500 |
| Front Suspension | independent, strut, coil springs, twin-tube gas-pressurized shocks, stabilizer bar |
| Rear Suspension | independent, multi-link, coil springs, twin-tube gas-pressurized shocks, stabilizer bar |
| Ground Clearance | 8.0 |
| Curb Weight | 4067 |
| Stock Tires | 235/55R17 |
| Brakes Front/Rear | disc/disc with ABS, EBD and Brake Assist |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.7 |
|
|
X3 & X5: Did BMW sell out?
I don't think it will diminish their reputation but it saddens me to see automakers like BMW, Porsche and even Benz...
11/01/2006 | 11:11 AM
|
|
|
When a HUMMER H3 is not a HUMMER
The Hummer H3 is like a BMW X3, both aim for people who can not afford (or too scared to drive) the Hummer H2 and the...
07/20/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
|
07 Trailblazer or Envoy vs. 05 Chrysler Pacifica
Thanks for the updated list of requirements. You've certainly included ALOT of them, which is good, but it also means...
07/18/2007 | 08:07 AM
|
|
|
Escalade , Tahoe or Expedition??
Would you believe it? The Range Rover shares many major chassis bones and the V8 engine with the BMW X5. Rover was...
09/08/2007 | 05:09 AM
|
|
|
Spy on the 2007 X3
Yup I agree. X3's design(looks) and quality make the car a shame to the BMWs....
06/27/2006 | 10:06 AM
|
|
2007 BMW X3 Photo Gallery
At its 2003 introduction, the X3 offered something no one else could--a luxury-compact with the versatility and all-road capability of a sport-utility, combined with the quality, performance and handl...
more
|
|
BMW X3
Should the X5 have been an only child?
more
|
|
2007 BMW X3 Photo Gallery
At its 2003 introduction, the X3 offered something no one else could--a luxury-compact with the versatility and all-road capability of a sport-utility, combined with the quality, performance and handl...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|