|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Honda Fit Review
All-new subcompact is fun, inexpensive and practical.
Driving Impressions
|
The easygoing nature of the Honda Fit is even more apparent underway. The engine is smooth and responsive, shifting is easy and it rides nicely. The Fit gets good gas mileage, achieving an EPA-estimated 33/38 mpg City/Highway with the manual gearbox and 31/38 mpg with the automatic. It's a flexible engine that's comfortable for running errands and commuting, yet ready to squirt away from any situation. It's smooth and quiet, very pleasant. The Fit is acknowledged to be the quickest car in its class. And, indeed, the 1.5-liter engine delivers brisk acceleration performance, revving smoothly to 6500-rpm, generating 109 horsepower and 105 pound-feet of torque. That's a little shy of the Nissan Versa, but the Fit is lighter. Its all-aluminum engine comes with Honda's VTEC variable-valve setup, four valves per cylinder and single overhead-cam, though it doesn't produce the explosive burst of power associated with the larger VTEC engines in Civic Si models. The five-speed automatic is popular and fun. Put it in drive and it does a good job of responding to the driver's wishes. Select the manual mode and the automatic can be shifted manually using paddles behind the steering wheel. Touch the one on the right with your fingers and it shifts up a gear, touch the one on the left and it downshifts. Do this in the normal Drive mode and it shifts up or down temporarily, a great feature when you just want a little boost going up a hill or for passing or when you want to short shift for better economy and smoothness. Put it in the Sport mode and it won't shift again until the driver shifts up or down. It's a nice setup.
|
|
|
We like the five-speed manual gearbox. It's smooth and easy, efficient and very enjoyable. The shift throws are short, giving it a sporty feel and the shifting is silky smooth. The ride is smooth and comfortable, possibly the most refined in the class. Noise and vibration levels are low, thanks to extensive effort on Honda's part in these areas. At times the Fit feels like an econobox, as it jostles about, tossing the heads of its occupants. But it's a pleasant car, one that we feel like we could live with happily. Handling is excellent, the best in the class. This is a highly maneuverable car, able to zip around traffic. It would be our choice among subcompacts for an autocross. The steering is precise and accurate, allowing the driver to steer the car exactly as intended. Front wheelspin is likely when accelerating from a standstill on wet, slippery pavement; there's no traction control. The turning radius is relatively wide at 34.4 feet for the Sport, nearly two feet wider than that of the Toyota Yaris, so it takes a wider road to make a U-turn. Braking is easy to control. The driver can easily modulate the brake pedal for smooth, accurate slowing or stopping. The brake system uses drums in the rear, less desireable than four-wheel discs, but they work fine for this lightweight car. next page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kia
To be honest I have never been impressed with many of the Korean cars. If you buy a car decently equiped, I can't...
08/09/2006 | 17:08 PM | sethster
|
|
2006 Future Shock!
Here they are, the 59 hottest cars, trucks, SUVs, and concepts headed your way in 2006 and beyond.
more
|
|
|
|
First Look: 2007 Honda Fit
Honda, never an automaker to ice a hot streak, will seemingly fit in just fine. It's getting back into the subcompact game with
more
|
|
2009 Honda Fit Photo Gallery
Honda is looking to capitalize on the U.S. market success of the first-generation Fit with the 2009 model. Get high quality phot
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|