|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Mazda MAZDA3 Review
Performance and luxury come standard.
Driving Impressions
|
As with so many cars, the character of the Mazda3 is determined by its engine. The 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine will produce 148 horsepower if you roar it to 6500 rpm, but it requires some intensity to wring out everything it has to give. We think this engine is really designed to offer great fuel economy, as its EPA rating of 28 mpg City/35 mpg Highway on regular-grade gasoline suggests. High-tech variable valve-timing helps improves torque low in the rpm range. The 2.0-liter engine costs less and is a good choice if you're concerned largely about fuel economy. The engine itself is great, but the Mazda3 itself is a little heavy, so you need all the power you can get. If you're looking for a combination to crawl in commuter traffic, the wide-ratio four-speed automatic is an acceptable choice, but you'll be have to use the transmission's manu-matic shifting feature to have any fun. The 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine uses all of Mazda's latest technology to deliver substantial power over a wide range of rpm. Its tractable mid-range power helps deliver good throttle response without the need to shift gears frequently. This character sets the Mazda 2.3-liter apart from its competition, and it's more like an engine from an Accord or Camry (larger, more powerful sedans) than its competition in the compact class.
|
|
|
Variable valve-timing and variable intake system improve low-rpm power, while electronic throttle control improves response. Counter-rotating balancers substantially reduce vibration, making this a particularly smooth-running powerplant. At the same time, the engine really does its best work above the torque peak of 150 pound-feet at 4000 rpm as it pulls to its power peak of 156 hp at 6500 rpm, so it needs a little help from the driver's shifting skills to stay in the fat part of the powerband. At the same time, the engine's fuel-economy ratings indicate there's also good things to be had when you drive at a relaxed pace, as it delivers and EPA-rated 26 mpg City/33 mpg Highway on regular grade gasoline. Both the sedan and the five-door are set up to take advantage of the strong personality afforded by Mazda's MZR-generation engines. The steering with its electro-hydraulic power assist responds crisply and accurately to your command, and the tires afford plenty of grip in the corners. The brakes are up to the task as well. Electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist are standard for S-models and optional for i-models. For 2007, traction control and stability control are available for s-models. As a fun-to-drive package, the Mazda3 has better credentials than its competition. It might not be entirely correct to put the Mazdaspeed3 in this group of Mazda3 models, as its turbocharged engine with direct fuel-injection delivers 263 hp at 5580 rpm. This front-wheel-drive car also has all the hardware to keep up with so much power, notably a six-speed manual transmission that rips off quick, clean shifts in a way that no other front-wheel drive car can match. The Mazdaspeed3 is a legitimate 155-mph automobile, yet it's really in its element in the corners. The chassis stays balanced and predictable right to the limit of tire adhesion, and there seem to be no surprises in the way it handles. The limited-slip differential helps keep both front tires delivering optimal power right to the limit, and it carves through the corners in a way that's distinct from its all-wheel-drive competitors like the Subaru WRX and Mitsubishi Evo. Meanwhile, the Mazdaspeed3 also has a quieter, calmer personality on the freeway than its competition. next page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Mazdaspeed3 Photo Gallery
Its credentials are imposing: 263 horsepower at 5500 rpm, 280 pound-feet of torque at 3000, 0 to 60 in less than six seconds, and a top speed of 155 mph.
more
|
|
Spied: Max ZOOM ZOOM for Mazdaspeed3
The popular Mazda3 is about to go gunning for Golf GTIs with a new high-performance version that promises close to 250 horsepower, a 0-to-60-mph time of about 6.0 seconds, and a top speed of around 15...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|