|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Below Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Subaru B9 Tribeca Review
New safety and convenience features.
Walkaround
|
The first thing you're likely to notice about Tribeca is its peculiar, three-part grille, which we are told suggests the nose and wings of an oncoming aircraft, and therefore reminds us of parent company Fuji Heavy Industries' heritage as an aircraft manufacturer. Only not everyone who looked the '06 Tribeca square in the snout saw an airplane, necessarily; instead we've heard it compared to all manner of things. The Tribeca front end looks to us like a poorly executed knockoff of a classic Alfa Romeo (a design said to be inspired by medieval heraldry). Undoubtedly aware of this difficulty, for 2007 Subaru has changed the Tribeca's grille from body color to black, claiming that the resulting contrast will better define an aircraft silhouette. Well, if they say so, but we still don't particularly like it. Of course that's a personal opinion. Some of our colleagues do like the Tribeca design. Others found it grew on them with time. Of course, we have better taste than they do. In any case, we don't consider the Tribeca's grille a deal breaker.
|
|
|
Overall, there is an undeniable aero-sleekness to the flow of the various surface planes and sculpting. Headlights are integrated into the leading edges of the front fenders. In plan view, the front end's curvature can be seen to ease the movement of the Tribeca through the air. The steeply raked windshield and A-pillars pull the eye up and over the tall glass house to a spoiler laid atop an acutely angled back window. Body side panels are mostly vertical, not quite slab-like; their expanse broken by mild fender blisters circling properly proportioned tires and wheels. Beginning at the trailing edge of the front door and even with the door handles, a soft crease grows as it moves rearward, giving the rear portions substance before ending in the wraparound taillights. An understated character line etched into the doors and running between the wheel arches draws attention to the matte-black rocker panels and subtly reminds the observant of the Tribeca's 8.4-inch ground clearance. As unsatisfied as we are with the Tribeca's front end, the back end leaves us wondering what exactly the theme was supposed to be there as well. The top half, above the continuation of the waist-high side crease, comprising the rear window and spoiler and looking rather light and airy, looks as if it came from a different vehicle than the bottom half, comprising most of the liftgate, the license plate surround, the bumper and lower trim panel and looking somewhat ponderous. Perhaps it's a consequence of having to package sufficient interior room for a third-row seat, but like the front end, it's a departure from the Subaru look we've come to know and will require some acclimation. And as fondly as we recall the previous century's hot rod era, the dual exhausts don't quite fit. By the way, the B9 designates the platform. Why did Subaru find it necessary to plug this into the name? We didn't have much luck getting that out of them. So we'll just call it the Tribeca, a name that goes well with Forester, Outback and Impreza. next page |
|
|
July is good-no-GREAT! month for Subaru
SUBARU OF AMERICA SALES SOAR TO BEST JULY IN COMPANY HISTORYSales of Subaru Impreza and Legacy 2.5i models lead company...
08/01/2006 | 16:08 PM
|
|
|
Saabaru #2 coming
Saab has given the OK to build a version of Subaru’s news B9 Tribeca crossover SUV. The 9-6X was supposed to be...
06/07/2005 | 17:06 PM
|
|
|
Safest automobile in the Market?
My personal advise on the matter is drive safely and hope that the driver in front and at the back of you do the same. ...
04/20/2007 | 15:04 PM
|
|
|
TOP TEN Vehicles (not companies) U ABSOLUTELY HATE FOR 2006-07
My list
1)Toyota Prius - Overpriced and people that own these simply don't know how to drive
2)Hummer H2 - It really...
09/19/2006 | 20:09 PM
|
|
|
Subaru Vs. Toyota
i really dont think subaru is more expensive than toyota. there has to be specific models in mind. your also...
07/20/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
Road Test: 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
There's nothing wrong with a vehicle having personality--but you don't want it to make you cringe. This is the controversy surrounding the B9 Tribeca.
more
|
|
2008 Subaru Tribeca
To say the B9 Tribeca wasn't quite the sales champ that Subaru had hoped is an understatement. Last year, Subaru managed to sell 18,000 Tribecas, when estimates were at 36,000. Nevertheless, we ordere...
more
|
|
First Test: 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
There's nothing wrong with a vehicle having personality--but you don't want it to make you cringe. This is the controversy surrounding the B9 Tribeca.
more
|
|
First Test: 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
There's nothing wrong with a vehicle having personality--but you don't want it to make you cringe. This is the controversy surrounding the B9 Tribeca.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|