|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Above Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kings Plaza Chrysler Contact: Internet Manager (888) 837-0611 |
2286 Flatbush Ave Brooklyn, NY 11234 Dealer Specials | Website |
| |

2005 | Acura TL Type-S Lakewood, New Jersey | Sedans | $22,495 | Gray | 25,434 |  | 42.2 mi |

2005 | Acura TL Type-S Lakewood, New Jersey | Sedans | $22,495 | Red | 31,544 |  | 42.2 mi |

2005 | Acura TL Type-S Lakewood, New Jersey | Sedans | $22,495 | Black | 32,511 |  | 42.2 mi |

2005 | Acura TL Type-S Lakewood, New Jersey | Sedans | $22,495 | Blue | 32,640 |  | 42.2 mi |

2005 | Acura TL Type-S Lakewood, New Jersey | Sedans | $22,495 | Gray | 34,856 |  | 42.2 mi |
|
PROFESSIONAL REVIEW
The market for near-luxury cars has changed dramatically in the last several years, and the Acura TL shows us the way in which personalized performance has become more important than restrained luxury. The front-wheel-drive Acura TL combines dramatic style, a powerful V6 engine, a responsive chassis. Just as important, the TL offers an extensive complement of the latest electronic features, making the driving experience more entertaining and more enjoyable as well as faster and safer. Since its introduction in 2004, the current-generation TL has led Acura toward a bolder, more aggressive identity. For 2007, the Acura TL receives a useful makeover that features styling changes and upgraded mechanical details, plus more electronic features. Most important, there are now two models, the standard TL and the performance-oriented TL Type-S.
|
|
2007 Acura TL S-type => need help
Whoa! I think there's right process about your complain. You better consult to the contract you signed. I know there a...
12/13/2007 | 03:12 AM
|
|
|
Acura TL 2006
I purchased a 2006 Acura TL and approximately 10k miles later, the motor begins to hiccup. The dealer cannot figure out...
01/05/2007 | 22:01 PM
|
|
|
2000 Tl Acura - engine and TCS light-Code P1399
I have just experienced the exact same problem with my 99 Acura TL. Have you been able to solve your problem?...
01/08/2007 | 12:01 PM
|
|
|
2007 Acura TL Type-S
I like the looks of the TL Type-S and i'm a general fan of sportier sedans, but in a sense they're unsatisfying. It's...
12/14/2006 | 11:12 AM
|
|
|
2001 Acura TL SQUEAK!!
Whenever i start my car in the morning or after a few hours It will squeak badly..Sometimes louder/worse then...
10/21/2005 | 16:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Spycam: 2009 Acura TL - COPY
The 2009 Acura TL is still months away from its debut in the fall, but the magic 8ball is already saying "outlook not so good" f
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|