|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

2007 | Toyota RAV4 Limited Claremont, California | SUVs | N/A | Silver | 25,018 |  | 55.0 mi |

2007 | Toyota RAV4 Limited Claremont, California | SUVs | N/A | Red | 27,963 |  | 55.0 mi |

2007 | Toyota RAV4 Sport Claremont, California | SUVs | N/A | Super White | 29,604 |  | 55.0 mi |

2007 | Toyota RAV4 Base Santa Monica, California | SUVs | $20,995 | Nautical Blue Metallic | 10,570 |  | 23.4 mi |

2007 | Toyota RAV4 Base Bakersfield, California | SUVs | $19,997 | White | 19,141 |  | 67.0 mi |
|
PROFESSIONAL REVIEW
Watching the recent evolution of the Toyota RAV4, one might conclude that, like children, little sport-utility vehicles eventually grow up. One day they are tiny, cute and cuddly, with feisty but economical four-cylinder engines. The next they've grown longer, wider, and taller, with family-size, three-row seating capacity and available V6 power. Cute just isn't enough anymore, and the RAV4 is a lot more than cute. After a complete redesign for 2006, the 2007 RAV4 gets significant safety improvements. Driver and front-passenger seat-mounted, side-impact airbags are now standard equipment, as are roll-sensing side-curtain airbags for first and second-row seats. Both systems were extra-cost options last year. Electronic entertainment options have also been updated. The recent redesign addressed the buying public's demand for power and space among compact SUVs. The RAV4's length increased by 14 inches, creating more headroom and legroom for second-row passengers, and increased shoulder room all around. Cargo capacity grew by five cubic feet. The base RAV4 still seats five and offers a more frugal four-cylinder power, but a third-row seat (that folds flat into the cargo floor) and a powerful V6 are available.
|
2008 Toyota Highlander Debut at Chicago Auto Show
February 7, 2007 – Chicago - Toyota Motor Sales (TMS), USA, Inc., unveiled the all-new next-generation Highlander and...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2008 Toyota Prius, RAV4, and Yaris get slight price increase
Toyota announced mid-year price adjustments to manufacturer's suggested retail prices (MSRP) today for the 2008 model...
12/03/2007 | 16:12 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Rogue: Will it sneak past Toyota, Honda?
The Nissan Rogue crossover has been in development for about four years and is expected to show up at Nissan...
10/02/2007 | 18:10 PM
|
|
2007 Honda CR-V Gets High Marks From Consumer Report
Consumer Reports magazine found much to like in testing Honda’s new CR-V against four other small SUVs in the...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Toyota, again, rules in Saving Gas
Consumer Reports released their 2008 auto issue, naming the Toyota Prius as the most fuel efficient car available to...
03/27/2008 | 19:03 PM
|
|
|
New Lexus SUV based on the Toyota RAV4
Anyone heard anything about it? ...or it is just hear sake....
11/12/2007 | 06:11 AM
|
|
|
'07 V6 Mustang vs. 07' Toyota Rav4
Thanks guys once again,...
08/13/2007 | 10:08 AM
|
|
|
2005 TOYOTA RAV4
One of a few things... Bad or loose tranny mount or missing parts. If the shifter is cable like the mech said then it...
01/23/2006 | 23:01 PM
|
|
|
02 toyota rav4 2wd
The transmission jerks going into 3rd gear at low rpms. changed fluid and filter. it also has a hard time...
03/27/2006 | 22:03 PM
|
|
|
SELLING & TRADE-IN QUESTION
i currently own a 2000 toyota rav4 ... is it possible for me to trade in for a 2005 toyota sienna? how much more would...
10/22/2006 | 10:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Drive: 2007 Toyota RAV4
Several years ago, when product planners were given the task of designing the third-generation Toyota RAV4, they knew what had to be done.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|