|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ford Ranger XL Long Bed Regular Cab Pickup Specs
|
|
• Four-wheel ABS
• 3.730:1 axle ratio
• Two disc brakes including two ventilated discs
• Electronic brake distribution
• Immobilizer
• Spacesaver steel rim under body spare wheel
• Wishbone front suspension independent with stabilizer bar and coil springs, beam rear suspension rigid with leaf springs
|
• Black front and rear bumpers
• Driver and passenger externally adjustable black door mirrors
• External dimensions: overall length (inches): 200.5, overall width (inches): 69.4, overall height (inches): 66.2, ground clearance (inches): 7.7, wheelbase (inches): 117.5, front track (inches): 58.5, rear track (inches): 57.3 and curb to curb turning circle (feet): 39.8
• Complex surface lens halogen bulb headlights
• Metallic paint
• Straight side pickup bed
• Fixed rear window
• Rear platform step
• Tinted glass on cabin and rear
• Trailer towing preparation
• Weights: gross vehicle weight rating (lbs) 4,420, curb weight (lbs) 3,069 and max payload (lbs) 1,260
• Windshield wipers with variable intermittent wipe
|
• 12v power outlet: front and 1
• Fixed mast antenna
• Front ashtray
• Audio system with AM/FM
• Cargo area dimensions: length (inches): 84.6, front width (inches): 54.3, width between arches (inches): 40.5, height (inches): 16.5 and loading floor height (inches): 29.7
• Rear tailgate cargo doors
• Front seats cigar lighter
• Clock
• Partial dashboard and floor console with open storage box
• Courtesy lights
• Front seats cup holders fixed
• Door ajar warning
• Floor covering: plastic/rubber in passenger compartment
• Driver front airbag with multi-stage deployment, passenger front airbag with occupant sensors and multi-stage deployment
• Split bench driver, passenger and center seat
• Height adjustable 3-point reel front seat belts on driver seat with pre-tensioners, height adjustable 3-point reel front seat belts on passenger seat with pre-tensioners, lap static front seat belts on center seat
• Two head restraints on front seats
• Internal dimensions: front headroom (inches): 39.2, front hip room (inches): 52.7, front leg room (inches): 42.4 and front shoulder room (inches): 54.5
• Low tire pressure indicator
• Power steering
• Rear view mirror
• Vinyl seat upholstery with additional vinyl
• Seating: three seats
• Two speaker(s)
• Plastic steering wheel
• Tachometer
• Ventilation system
|
|
|
|
Ford Ranger: Automaker Mulls Demise of Small Truck Segment
If the Ford Ranger was a human being, he might be expecting a retirement banquet and that gold watch from the company...
06/10/2007 | 18:06 PM
|
|
Ford Quality Overtakes Segment Leaders
DEARBORN, Mi., June 4, 2008 – Ford brand vehicles improved in quality at a rate faster than the industry average,...
06/11/2008 | 06:06 AM
|
|
Ford Cruise Control Recall Affects Over 3 Million Vehicles
Last week, Ford Motor Co. and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it was recalling 3.6...
08/06/2007 | 17:08 PM
|
|
Ford Offers Zero Percent Financing, Cash Back on 2007 Models
DEARBORN, Mich., June 28, 2007 -- The hottest Ford, Lincoln and Mercury cars, trucks and SUVs are about to get even...
07/09/2007 | 14:07 PM
|
|
How Your Auto Insurance Carrier can 'Steer' you Wrong
Have you ever been unfortunate enough to have had an accident or break-in that required an auto insurance-funded...
01/22/2008 | 18:01 PM
|
|
|
ABS problems 1999 Ford Ranger
I am having this same problem with my 1999 Ranger. Did you get your problem resolved?...
08/05/2008 | 14:08 PM
|
|
|
87 Ford Ranger, Strange sputter and stall
Hello everyone,...
06/13/2008 | 16:06 PM
|
|
|
2000 Ford Ranger Brake Problems
Look on the inside of the front axle/hub Assembly for an exciter ring. If you don't have front ABS then the only thing...
01/04/2008 | 23:01 PM
|
|
|
96 Ford Ranger shifter
I am looking at buying a ranger pick up, it has a 3 litre engine and a 4 spd auto transmission, the shifter is hard to...
11/18/2007 | 16:11 PM
|
|
|
1992 Ford Ranger 3.0
Check your Vacume Reading With a Gauage you should have about 19 in ,and also inspect for Transmission fluid in...
03/19/2007 | 03:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review: 2006 Ford Ranger
When the current Ford Ranger began its life in 1992, it cast a large footprint in the market. Its initial advantages in size over the truly compact competitors gave it an edge, but that was soon tempe...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|