|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nissan Titan LE Short Bed Extended Cab Pickup Recalls
| Recall Date: |
JAN 25, 2008 |
| Component: |
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS |
| Model Affected: |
TITAN |
| Units Affected: |
5523
Recall Details
|
Recall Date:
JAN 25, 2008
Model Affected:
2008 NISSAN TITAN
Summary:
NISSAN IS RECALLING 5,523 MY 2008 TITAN, FRONTIER AND XTERRA VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, 'TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES.' THE TIRE PLACARD LISTS AN INCORRECT VEHICLE CAPACITY WEIGHT.
Consequence:
THIS STANDARD SPECIFIES REQUIREMENTS FOR TIRE SELECTION TO PREVENT OVERLOADING.
Remedy:
NISSAN WILL MAIL A CORRECT TIRE PLACARD AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS TO OWNERS OF THE AFFECTED VEHICLES. THE RECALL BEGAN ON FEBRUARY 25, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Units Affected:
5523
Notes:
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. R0802
| Recall Date: |
APR 24, 2008 |
| Component: |
SEATS |
| Model Affected: |
TITAN |
| Units Affected: |
1126
Recall Details
|
Recall Date:
APR 24, 2008
Model Affected:
2008 NISSAN TITAN
Summary:
NISSAN IS RECALLING 1,126 MY 2008 QUEST, TITAN AND ARMADA VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH MANUAL ADJUSTMENT FRONT SEATS. THESE VEHICLES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 207, "SEATING SYSTEMS." THE SEAT TRACK ASSEMBLY MAY HAVE BEEN MANUFACTURED OUT OF SPECIFICATION.
Consequence:
THIS MAY RESULT IN THE MANUAL SEAT PAWL NOT FULLY ENGAGING INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURIES IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.
Remedy:
DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE SEAT TRACK ASSEMBLY ON THE DRIVER'S AND FRONT PASSENGER SEATS AND REPLACE THE ENTIRE SEAT ASSEMBLY FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Units Affected:
1126
Notes:
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
|
2009 Nissan Titan's Extra $190 to Offset Increased Manufactu
Nissan announced pricing on a number of select 2009 models, includingthe Nissan Altima Sedan, Altima Coupe, Altima...
08/08/2008 | 20:08 PM
|
|
2009 Nissan Minivans, Pickups, SUVs, and Trucks More Featur
Nissan Motor Co. recently released information on its crossover, minivans, SUVs, and pickup trucks....
08/04/2008 | 00:08 AM
|
|
2008 Nissan Titan offers more Options starting at $25,330
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (Oct. 24, 2007) -- Nissan today announced pricing on the 2008.5 Nissan Titan full-size pickup, which...
11/29/2007 | 22:11 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Titan Slight Price Jump Still a Bargain
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (August, 2007) -- Nissan earlier this month announced interim price increases on the 2008 Nissan Titan....
08/27/2007 | 14:08 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Changes - Altima (Coupe), Rogue, Titan
NASHVILLE (June 28, 2007) - Nissan's 2008 model year is off to a strong, early start with four new or significantly...
07/09/2007 | 14:07 PM
|
|
|
Nissan Titan Sonar
Anybody out there know if the Titan's rear sonar system is modular enough to remove from a salvaged truck? Not...
10/01/2006 | 08:10 AM
|
|
|
2006 Vehicle Satisfaction Awards
By AutoPacific:...
05/17/2006 | 17:05 PM
|
|
|
Bad Experience with Nissan
Hi, I guess I am like another person I saw on here complaining about Ford. Though mine was about just the dealer, it...
03/14/2008 | 01:03 AM
|
|
|
Nissan & GM Top Quality Ratings
Nissan, GM Head Vehicle Quality Survey By DEE-ANN DURBIN AP Auto Writer Nissan Motor Co. and General Motors Corp. were...
05/16/2005 | 18:05 PM
|
|
|
nissan titan 2004&2005
why would you want to know that?...
08/05/2007 | 03:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Drive: 2004 Nissan Titan
The company that first introduced America to the wiles of the compact pickup some 45 years ago is finally giving its truck buyers a move-up property--its first-ever full-size pickup truck. Can it riva...
more
|
|
|
|
Motor Trend 2004 Truck Of The Year Testing
How do you compare a 500-horsepower, Viper-powered Dodge, a four-cylinder GM entry-level truck, Nissan's bodacious, first-ever full-size pickup, a convertible retro-rod-like Chevy, the biggest Toyota ...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|