|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Ford Ranger Classifieds
| Year | Model | Type | Price | Color | Mileage | Seller | Dist |
| PREMIUM LISTINGS |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Buckeye, Arizona | Trucks | N/A | Black Clearcoat | 7,272 |  | 356.2 mi |
![2008 Ford Ranger]()
2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Cottonwood, Arizona | Trucks | $14,995 | | 98 |  | 390.8 mi |
| FEATURED LISTINGS |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport San Bernardino, California | Trucks | $19,999 | Gray | 1,558 | 888-851-8418 | 60.9 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Valencia, California | Trucks | $15,994 | White | 5,137 | Dealer | 33.8 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Casa Grande, Arizona | Trucks | $17,367 | Blue | 2,567 | Dealer | 409.8 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Rowland Heights, California | Trucks | $22,790 | Grey | 3,088 | Dealer | 21.6 mi |
| STANDARD LISTINGS |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Glendale, California | Trucks | $17,952 | Gray | 840 | Dealer | 10.1 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT North Hollywood, California | Trucks | $16,505 | Gray | 912 | Dealer | 14.3 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Fontana, California | Trucks | $15,999 | White | 17,688 | Dealer | 50.2 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Visalia, California | Trucks | $25,680 | Red | 5,478 | Dealer | 159.6 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Clovis, California | Trucks | N/A | Black | 3,817 | Dealer | 198.6 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger Sport Oakdale, California | Trucks | $15,999 | White | 2,791 | Dealer | 285.9 mi |
![2008 Ford Ranger]()
2008 | Ford Ranger XL San Jose, California | Trucks | $12,991 | | 0 | Dealer | 303.6 mi |
![2008 Ford Ranger]()
2008 | Ford Ranger XL Half Moon Bay, California | Trucks | $13,999 | White | 100 | Dealer | 339.4 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Daly City, California | Trucks | $15,888 | White | 7,992 | Dealer | 349.3 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Fernley, Nevada | Trucks | N/A | Red | 11,624 | Dealer | 354.7 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Napa, California | Trucks | $19,990 | White | 12,854 | Dealer | 367.6 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XL Grass Valley, California | Trucks | $14,998 | White | 9,337 | Dealer | 369.4 mi |
![2008 Ford Ranger]()
2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Cottonwood, Arizona | Trucks | N/A | | 3,652 | Dealer | 390.8 mi |

2008 | Ford Ranger XLT Mesa, Arizona | Trucks | $17,888 | White | 2,574 | Dealer | 403.2 mi |
| Year | Model | Type | Price | Color | Mileage | Seller | Dist |
|
|
Ford Ranger: Automaker Mulls Demise of Small Truck Segment
If the Ford Ranger was a human being, he might be expecting a retirement banquet and that gold watch from the company...
06/10/2007 | 18:06 PM
|
|
Ford Quality Overtakes Segment Leaders
DEARBORN, Mi., June 4, 2008 – Ford brand vehicles improved in quality at a rate faster than the industry average,...
06/11/2008 | 06:06 AM
|
|
Ford Cruise Control Recall Affects Over 3 Million Vehicles
Last week, Ford Motor Co. and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it was recalling 3.6...
08/06/2007 | 17:08 PM
|
|
Ford Offers Zero Percent Financing, Cash Back on 2007 Models
DEARBORN, Mich., June 28, 2007 -- The hottest Ford, Lincoln and Mercury cars, trucks and SUVs are about to get even...
07/09/2007 | 14:07 PM
|
|
How Your Auto Insurance Carrier can 'Steer' you Wrong
Have you ever been unfortunate enough to have had an accident or break-in that required an auto insurance-funded...
01/22/2008 | 18:01 PM
|
|
|
03 Ford Ranger
I have a Ford Ranger - Manual Transmission....
06/18/2008 | 18:06 PM
|
|
|
2000 Ford Ranger Brake Problems
Look on the inside of the front axle/hub Assembly for an exciter ring. If you don't have front ABS then the only thing...
01/04/2008 | 23:01 PM
|
|
|
96 Ford Ranger shifter
I am looking at buying a ranger pick up, it has a 3 litre engine and a 4 spd auto transmission, the shifter is hard to...
11/18/2007 | 16:11 PM
|
|
|
1992 Ford Ranger 3.0
Check your Vacume Reading With a Gauage you should have about 19 in ,and also inspect for Transmission fluid in...
03/19/2007 | 03:03 AM
|
|
|
2001 Ford Ranger 4.0 4x4 transmission
I have a 2001 Ranger that has 63,000 miles on it. The problem has just started that sometimes when the truck is placed...
02/15/2007 | 13:02 PM
|
| |