|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Mercury Milan Review
Driving Impressions
|
The MercuryMilan's 221-hp V6 engine and Japanese Aisin six-speed automatic transmission give the driver the kind of power we all like when it comes to getting across the intersection or getting out of a tight spot. Unfortunately, there's not a lot of reserve after that, and there's not a lot of satisfaction in driving it hard. The engine feels a bit choked and a bit underpowered, and doesn't sound like a powerful engine when prodded. A full-throttle kickdown maneuver causes the front end to pitch up a bit too high for our taste, leaving the front tires scrambling for traction and direction for an annoying split second. While this engine is adequate, the V6s offered by Honda, General Motors, Nissan and Toyota are more modern and have more power. Fuel economy for the V6 is EPA rated at 26 mpg Highway and 18 mpg City. Those numbers drop to 17/25 mpg with all-wheel drive. The four-cylinder engine is rated at 20/29 mpg with the manual and 20/28 mpg with the automatic.
|
|
|
The four-cylinder engine has decent power but is not as strong as the four-cylinders offered by Honda, Nissan and Toyota. It requires planning and space to make a pass on a two-lane road. The standard five-speed manual transmission has numb, rubbery throws that are anything but sporty. We found the steering to have a fairly hefty feel and effort at the wheel, but it was a bit too disconnected from the road surface for our taste. Aggressive cornering revealed the Milan to be predictable, with a slight bias toward understeer, which is the default handling characteristic for family cars. Handling was a bit sharper with the available 17-inch wheels and tires versus the base model's 16-inch tires. Stability at speed was impressive. Ride quality, which we tested on the awful streets of Detroit, was quite good with either the 16- or 17-inch wheels. The Milan has lots of compliance to soak up bumps, doesn't exhibit much body roll, and is generally quiet and smooth in operation. The brakes also proved to be strong and direct, without a lot of wasted pedal travel before deceleration starts to happen. It takes little effort to get the Milan to stop. next page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How American is enough?
The whole import-domestic classification has been an issue since the 80s or so (when every foreigner set up a plant...
02/10/2005 | 19:02 PM | GenderBender
|
|
|
|
|
|
What to lease. Help!
Franky, I'm shocked that you can get $200 per month payments on a roughly $20K car.
If you're cross-shoping fords and...
04/30/2007 | 22:04 PM | joela
|
|
|
|
|
|