|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Mercury Mountaineer Review
Traditional SUV hauls seven, pulls trailers.
|
Interior
The Mountaineer gauges show only the essentials (speedometer, tachometer, fuel and coolant) organized within a recessed pod surrounded by a satin-finish, metallic ring. It's a simple arrangement, but given the Mountaineer's workhorse capabilities, as evidenced by the V8's 7220-pound tow rating, we'd like to see gauges for oil temperature and voltage. The dash is clean, though, with attractive, low-key, metallic accents. The materials are generally nice, though there are some plastics that smack of cost-cutting.The stereo and climate controls in the center stack have large, finger-friendly buttons with or without the optional navigation system. The results here are mixed. The stereo and navigation system operate on separate power supplies, so you can have a map displayed without having the stereo on. That's not true of all navigation systems, including those from Mercedes. However, the stereo tuning function is buried beneath a sequential rocker switch, forcing you to wait while it scrolls up or down through the frequency band to find any station other than one of the presets. The navigation system screen could be larger, but the information it provides is adequate and accuracy is above average. On the other hand, with the navigation system and satellite radio, the Mountaineer, like other Ford products, has a competitive advantage. You can simply punch in the three-digit station of your choice, which is much better than scrolling through up to 80 or so stations to get to the one you want.
|
|
|
The front seats are comfortable, with adequate thigh support and bolsters. Overall, passenger roominess is competitive for the class. The Mountaineer offers comparable headroom in the front seats as the GMC Envoy and Nissan Pathfinder, trailing them by less than an inch; front-seat legroom betters the Envoy by an inch and equals the Pathfinder; front-seat hiproom is almost identical. Second-row head- and legroom is comparable to the Envoy, but the Mountaineer offers significantly 2.5 inches more legroom than the Pathfinder's second row, a noticeable difference. However, the Mountaineer doesn't have nearly as much second-row hiproom as the Envoy and Pathfinder do. The middle-row bench seat has full seatbelts for three but head restraints for only the outboard passengers. The third-row seats in the Mountaineer are significantly roomier than those in the competition', with nearly three inches more legroom than Envoy and more than six inches over the Pathfinder. Headroom and hiproom are comparable. The third row is a bench seat with minimal padding and fixed-height head restraints, which loom large in the back window; they do collapse, but only by tugging a loop hanging out the backside. Much better are the optional third-row seats that can be power-folded via two rocker buttons in the rear cargo area, directly below a thoughtfully provided button for power central locking. Accessing the third row is a three-step process that doesn't strike us as all that secure. First, you pull a strap that releases the head restraints so they fold forward. Then you pull up on a stiff lever to fold the seatback down on the seat bottom. And then you lift the heavy seat assembly, rocking it forward toward the front seats, where it parks, unrestrained, while people crawl into and out of the third row seats. If you lean on it while climbing out, it can rock back, and possibly hit your foot. We like the look of some of the light-colored interiors, though we're concerned they'll get dirty. The light-colored, suede-like inserts attract dirt like a magnet and, once dirtied, are a hassle to spruce up. Mercury's Sync communications and entertainment system, due later in the model year, can recognize Bluetooth-enabled cell phones, access their phonebooks, and play calls and read text messages through the speakers. It also has a USB interface to connect with iPods and other MP3 players. Voice commands and/or steering wheel buttons can be used to control all functions. The rear-seat entertainment system, controls and all, is housed in a black plastic box suspended from the ceiling and running the width of the roof immediately behind the front seats. The drop-down screen seems small a bit small. When in position for viewing, the video screen combines with the rear head restraints to render the rearview mirror virtually useless. Outward visibility elsewhere is good, with less obstruction than expected from the thick C-pillars. The door panels are an example of how safety and ergonomics sometimes don't mix well. The idea behind the layout of the interior door panels, front and rear, was to use the armrests and door pulls to supplement the impact protection hardware built into the door's innards. Thus, the armrests and door pulls were separated, with the pulls positioned below the armrests. As a result, the door pulls are well below and forward of the natural plane of the arm and wrist. This poor ergonomic positioning makes it a bear to grab hold of the pulls and they offer too little leverage to make closing the doors easy. In addition, the inside latch handles are positioned all the way forward at the end of the armrests, where they're 'a stretch to get to and at an illogical angle to operate. Though Mercury (and Ford, which uses the same design on the Explorer) announced the door panels would be reconfigured as early as 2006, nothing has been done to this point. In back, the Mountaineer offers only 13.6 cubic feet of cargo space behind the third-row seats. That's less than either the Envoy or the Pathfinder, by nearly 10 cubic feet versus the former and by nearly three cubic feet versus the latter. Fold down the third row and it offers 43.9 cubic feet of cargo room, about the same as the Envoy but more than five cubic feet less than the Pathfinder. With both back rows of seats folded, however, the Mountaineer prevails. Its 83.1 cubic feet of cargo space are three cubic feet more than the GMC and Nissan. We'd like to have some hooks on which to hang grocery bags like those found on the Chrysler Town & Country and other vehicles. next page |
|
|
Mercury Mountaineer
I have a 1999 mountaineer, which I LOVE....It has a garage door opener on the sun visor, I have misplaced my owners...
06/05/2007 | 23:06 PM
|
|
|
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Transmission wont change Gear
We bought this vehicle exactly one year ago and did all the required servicing. On the weekend while making 40mph tried...
12/06/2005 | 00:12 AM
|
|
|
Dual Zone - Air Condiditioning 2002 Mercury Mountaineer
Is there supose to be a difference between Driver and Passenger A/C's. If not is there a fix?...
05/03/2006 | 11:05 AM
|
|
|
Towing Package??
Okay, my dad is looking at this used 1998 Mercury Mountaineer. Its in PA and we live in VA. We saw the car on a...
01/16/2007 | 08:01 AM
|
|
|
Reverse
My wife just came back from shopping with the following story: She said that while stopped at a red light the car which...
01/22/2006 | 00:01 AM
|
|
Hottest 50 Cars, Trucks, and SUVs for 2006
The new model year is upon us, bringing the darlings of the last auto show season to our local dealers and driveways. From show floor to showroom, these are the most promising new models.
more
|
|
Hottest 50 Cars, Trucks, and SUVs for 2006
The new model year is upon us, bringing the darlings of the last auto show season to our local dealers and driveways. From show floor to showroom, these are the most promising new models.
more
|
|
Hottest 50 Cars, Trucks, and SUVs for 2006
The new model year is upon us, bringing the darlings of the last auto show season to our local dealers and driveways. From show floor to showroom, these are the most promising new models.
more
|
|
Hottest 50 Cars, Trucks, and SUVs for 2006
The new model year is upon us, bringing the darlings of the last auto show season to our local dealers and driveways. From show floor to showroom, these are the most promising new models.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |