|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Review
All-new, improved styling, new engine.
2008 Lancer Review Summary & Specifications
|
The new, 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer may not be the most attractive, the most popular, the most powerful, the most efficient or the most fun-to-drive in the affordable, compact sedan class. But in each of those measures, it's second in line or at least competitive. That makes it well worth a look when shopping for a car in this class. [NewCarTestDrive.com correspondent Tom Lankard filed this report from Santa Barbara, California.]
|
|
| Vehicle Category | Compact Cars |
| Editor | Tom Lankard |
| Model Lineup | Mitsubishi Lancer DE; ES; GTS |
| Engines (standard) | 2.0-liter, dohc, 16-valve, inline-4 |
| Engines (optional) | 152-hp, 2.0-liter inline-4 |
| Transmissions (standard) | 21/29 |
| Transmissions (optional) | 5-speed manual; CVT automatic; Sportronic CVT |
| Safety Equipment (standard) | frontal airbags; side-impact airbags; side-curtain airbags; driver's side knee airbag; LATCH; tire pressure monitoring system; ABS with EBD (on ES and GTS; optional on DE) |
| Safety Equipment (optional) | ABS with EBD |
| Basic Warranty | 5 years/60,000 miles |
| Assembled In | Mizushima, Japan |
| Manufacturer Phone | 1-800-648-7820 |
| Manufacturer URL | www.mitsubishicars.com |
| Base Price MSRP | |
| Model Tested MSRP | Lancer ES |
| Standard Equipment | air conditioning with micron air filter; power windows, outside mirrors and keyless, central locking; tilt steering wheel with cruise control and redundant audio switches; 6-way/4-way, manually adjustable driver/front passenger seats; fabric upholstery; AM/FM/CD/MP3 stereo; Sirius satellite radio and Bluetooth cellular telephone pre-wiring; driver information center; 60/40-split, folding rear seatback; auto-off headlights |
| Destination Charge | |
| Options as Tested (MSRP) | Sun & Sound package - Rockford-Fosgate sound system, six-disc in-dash CD/MP3 changer, power glass sunroof |
| Gas Guzzler Tax | |
| Price as Tested | |
| Layout | front-wheel drive |
| Horse Power | 152 @ 6000 |
| Torque | 146 @ 4250 |
| Fuel Economy | 5-speed manual |
| Wheelbase | 103.7 |
| Length/Width/Height | 180/69.4/58.7 |
| Track Front/Rear | |
| Turning Radius | 32.8 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 |
| Front Head/Hip/Leg room | 38.5/53.3/42.2 |
| Middle Head/Hip/Leg room | |
| Rear Head/Hip/Leg room | 36.9/54.1/36.1 |
| Trunk Volume | 11.6 |
| Payload | |
| Towing Capacity | not recommended |
| Front Suspension | independent MacPherson strut, coil spring, gas-pressurized shock, stabilizer bar |
| Rear Suspension | independent multi-link, coil spring, gas-pressurized shock, stabilizer bar |
| Ground Clearance | 5.8 |
| Curb Weight | 2944 |
| Stock Tires | P205/60R16 |
| Brakes Front/Rear | ventilated disc/drum with ABS, EBD |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.3 |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart: Middle Child Extraordinaire
The Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart has hit the stage and preliminary testsfind it to be well, much of what was expected....
07/09/2008 | 22:07 PM
|
|
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer satisfies Consumers
June 24, 2008 -- CYPRESS, Calif. -- Adding to its impressive collectionof industry awards and accolades, the 2008...
06/26/2008 | 17:06 PM
|
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution moves Down Market
Ok, that's not necessarily true since that nameplate won't be used. However to say that the Lancer is moving up market...
06/04/2008 | 07:06 AM
|
|
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart: Turbocharged Middle Child
January 13, 2008 -- CYPRESS, Calif. -- The new Lancer Ralliart reinforces the sporty identity of the Lancer lineup...
01/17/2008 | 16:01 PM
|
|
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer: Attention to Details
January 13, 2008 -- CYPRESS, Calif. -- The Mitsubishi Lancer for 2009 delivers thrilling dynamics, "class-up" value,...
02/02/2008 | 23:02 PM
|
|
|
|
First Drive: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancers
After the successful launch of its red-hot Evolution, Mitsubishi is seeking ways to crank more sales out of the Lancer lineup. One source of additional heat is Mitsu's new high-performance and motorsp...
more
|
|
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart
Mitsubishi has a match ready for Subaru's plain WRX. The 2009 Lancer Ralliart gets a turbo four-cylinder making an estimated 235 hp and 253 lb-ft of torque.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |