|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Saab 9-3 Review
New looks, more power; available all-wheel drive.
2008 9-3 Review Summary & Specifications
|
The 2008 Saab 9-3 is the prettiest, sportiest Saab ever built. It offers a great combination of performance, comfort, and space, and real-world gas mileage that won't break the family piggybank. The 9-3 does business in a crowded part of the market, the $35,000 near-luxury segment, and it's a worthy competitor, with lots of built-in value and a long-standing reputation for active and passive safety. NewCarTestDrive.com correspondent Jim McCraw filed this report from Washington.
|
|
| Vehicle Category | Luxury Cars |
| Editor | Jim McCraw |
| Model Lineup | Saab 9-3 2.0T; Aero; Aero XWD |
| Engines (standard) | 2.8-liter dohc 24-valve V6 |
| Engines (optional) | 210-hp 2.0-liter turbo I4; 255-hp 2.8-liter turbo V6; 280-hp 2.8-liter turbo V6 |
| Transmissions (standard) | 6-speed automatic |
| Transmissions (optional) | 6-speed manual; 6-speed automatic |
| Safety Equipment (standard) | frontal airbags, side-impact airbags, curtain airbags, ABS, EBD, traction control, ESP |
| Safety Equipment (optional) | all-wheel drive |
| Basic Warranty | 3 years/36,000 miles |
| Assembled In | Trollhattan, Sweden |
| Manufacturer Phone | 1-800-SAAB-USA |
| Manufacturer URL | www.gm.com/saab |
| Base Price MSRP | 28385 |
| Model Tested MSRP | Saab 9-3 Limited sedan ($28,385) |
| Standard Equipment | leather upholstery, air conditioning, power steering, power disc brakes, keyless entry, power windows, power locks, power mirrors, console, cruise control, floor shift, driving lights, AM/FM/CD |
| Destination Charge | |
| Options as Tested (MSRP) | none |
| Gas Guzzler Tax | |
| Price as Tested | 35365 |
| Layout | front-wheel drive |
| Horse Power | 255 @ 6250 |
| Torque | 258 @ 2000 |
| Fuel Economy | 16/26 |
| Wheelbase | 105.3 |
| Length/Width/Height | 182.5/69.0/56.4 |
| Track Front/Rear | |
| Turning Radius | 39 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 |
| Front Head/Hip/Leg room | 39.6/56.3/41.4 |
| Middle Head/Hip/Leg room | |
| Rear Head/Hip/Leg room | 38.9/55.1/35.1 |
| Trunk Volume | 15.0 |
| Payload | |
| Towing Capacity | 1000 |
| Front Suspension | independent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, gas shocks. stabilizer bar |
| Rear Suspension | independent, 4-link, coil springs, gas shocks, stabilizer bar |
| Ground Clearance | 6.1 |
| Curb Weight | 3285 |
| Stock Tires | P235/45R17 |
| Brakes Front/Rear | disc/disc with ABS, EBD |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.4 |
|
|
Used jag x-type vs saab 9-3
I found these two cars 2003-04 year with 80k miles on them and with similar prices. I like Jag because of style (and my...
12/21/2007 | 08:12 AM
|
|
|
Carsoft, PARTS 1- 7, Car Diagnostic and Tunning equipment, Dashboard t
Carsoft, PARTS 1- 7, Car Diagnostic and Tunning equipment, Dashboard tools, Workshop manuals
please send e-mail to : ...
01/04/2008 | 00:01 AM
|
|
|
Sub-$10k used daily driver... with a twist
I don't want a Civic or a Corolla, an Accord or a Camry. In fact, I want a hatchback. So what are we left with?...
01/20/2008 | 08:01 AM
|
|
|
Least reliable luxo's for 2006
From Forbes:
Land Rover LR3
Land Rover Range Rover
Lincoln Navigator
Saab 9-3
Volkswagen...
07/31/2006 | 13:07 PM
|
|
|
car makes and your favorites
Could you list all the car makes you remember, and your favorite model of each one? Also, could you put your edits in...
07/25/2006 | 22:07 PM
|
|
2006 Saab 9-3 SportCombi
Yes, you can say that the SportCombi is only a station wagon, but in so doing, you would miss the point of the latest 9-3. This
more
|
|
|
|
2008 Saab 9-3 XWD
Saab's new all-wheel-drive system, coined cross-wheel drive (XWD), might be late to the party, but it's anything but behind the
more
|
|
Hottest 50 Cars, Trucks, and SUVs for 2006
The new model year is upon us, bringing the darlings of the last auto show season to our local dealers and driveways. From show floor to showroom, these are the most promising new models.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |